Design & Communication
Tech & Development
Business Operations
Strategy, Talent & Management
Engineering
Microsoft Business Applications
Data & AI Advisory
By June 28, 2025, the e-commerce sector must accommodate with the Accessibility Directive. In a hurry to live up to the legal requirements, it might be tempting to take shortcuts and use quick fixes like accessibility overlays. But are they ensuring compliance, improving usability or even economically defensible?
Accessibility overlays are most often some JavaScript that lays over a websites’ design stack and can be used to provide more information or actions, such as highlighting links, hide images or increase the line height. You might also in some cases be able to select your accessibility profile that will adapt the site for that specific disability. It sounds kind of inclusive, doesn’t it? To generalize groups of people with the same sort of disability is problematic because as Dr Stephen Shore says, “If you’ve met one individual with autism, you’ve met one individual with autism.”. We are all people with different abilities, difficulties and strategies to cope with our everyday life regardless of whether we share the same diagnosis or not. So even if Accessibility overlays tries to address accessibility issues and create an inclusive online experience, they miss the mark.
They may seem like a budget-friendly shortcut, but building accessibility into the website from the start is a smarter investment. Overlays might cost less initially, but ongoing fixes and potential issues could add up.
Integrating accessibility directly into the development process means that you are crafting a website with accessibility in mind from the get-go. This proactive approach ensures that each element is designed to be inclusive, minimizing the need for subsequent fixes. It is also cheaper to build in accessibility form the beginning than fixing problems after release or later in the development chain. Industry research and case studies suggest that fixing accessibility issues after release can range from three to ten times the cost, depending on the scope and severity of the issues.
Hypothetical scenariosi
Integrating accessibility from the beginning:
Initial development cost = X SEK
Ongoing testing and maintenance for accessibility = Y SEK (where Y is a fraction of X)
Total cost = X + Y SEK
Addressing accessibility issues after release:
Initial development cost X SEK
Post-release fixes and retroactive changes = 3X to 10X SEK
Total cost = 4X to 11X SEK
Embracing accessibility within your organization is not just a question of compliance, it is good for brand perception and business as well. About 20% of the population has a disability, so excluding them means missing out on potential customers. But addressing accessibility is good for many reasons.
• Makes it easier for all users.
• It promotes innovation.
• Creates more engaged co-workers.
• Low risk for mitigation.
Successfully addressing accessibility challenges not only benefits those with disabilities but extends to everyone, fostering a more inclusive and user-friendly digital environment for all.
Accessibility simply makes it easier for all your users.
Quick fixes like accessibility overlays may be tempting for e-commerce to meet the Accessibility Directive, but they fall short in creating true inclusivity. While seeming quicker and cheaper, investing in integrated accessibility from the start proves to be a wiser choice, minimizing costs in the long run. Embracing accessibility is not just compliance; it’s a strategic move that benefits brand perception and taps into the significant spending power of people with disabilities, constituting around 20% of the population. Overall, prioritizing accessibility is not just a legal requirement but a strategic investment in a more inclusive and user-friendly future for e-commerce.